Cases 1 - 10 of 476
Rosser v. Gardner et al
as 7:2024cv00617
Defendant:
D.C. Gardner, John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Sean K. Rosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Edwards, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jordan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Phipps et al
as 7:2024cv00586
Defendant:
John Doe, Lt. Fleming, R.O.C. Gregory Hollaway and others
Plaintiff:
Destined George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeno v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00573
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Williams, Larry Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reich v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00553
Respondent:
Unknown
Petitioner:
John Adalf Reich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shouse v. Caudill et al
as 7:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Caudill, Caudwell and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alan Shouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00475
Defendant:
B. Steffey, Johnny Hall, Jordan Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lowel Bowman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koob v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00451
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, J. Barnett, M.J. Blaha and others
Plaintiff:
Igor Koob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Nichols, Andrew Lawson, Josh Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Natori Benton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gerald v. Thurber et al
as 7:2024cv00420
Defendant:
John Doe, Justin Thurber, M. Vinzant and others
Plaintiff:
Lukeen Gerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
