Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane Engineering, Inc. v. Washington County Service Authority
as 1:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Lane Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Washington County Service Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Alcorn v. Amherst County Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2019cv00402
Defendant:
Sheriff Lane Perry, Henry County Jail, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Delberia Bradley Alcorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ouellette v. Lane et al
as 7:2019cv00342
Defendant:
Misty Lane and Southwest Regional Jail Athority
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Tazewell County Sheriff Department et al
as 7:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Tazewell County Sheriff Department, Lane, Criag Meneffee and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Cunningham et al
as 7:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Otis Terry Cunningham and Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dawn Bradley Lane and Randolph Scott Bradley
Respondent:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Lane et al
as 7:2018cv00487
Defendant:
C.O. Lane and Duffield Regional Jail Facility
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. USA
as 5:2012cv80545
Petitioner:
Stacey Lane Fisher
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tew v. USA
as 7:2012cv80437
Petitioner:
Candace Lane Tew
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Casey v. Russell et al
as 7:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Casey
Defendant:
Ms. Sarah Lane and Bobby D. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
