Cases 31 - 40 of 663
Crumpton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
William D. Crumpton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Harold Clarke, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vyas v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Respondent:
Harold Clarke, Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00569
Petitioner:
Roderick W. McDowell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Brown
Defendant:
Corrections Officer S. Collier, Correctional Officer S. Boggs, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayers v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Jerry David Sayers
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foran v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Darius Lee Foran, Sr.
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butts v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malvo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Malvo
Defendant:
Director Harold Clarke, Warden Rick White, Major C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Giles
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Lockriagh et al
as 7:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Saunders Miles Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendant Lockriagh, C/O Allen, Dottie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
