Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Rucker v. Crown Auto, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00058
Defendant:
Crown Auto, Inc. and Land's Towing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Toni Rucker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Minnick v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00514
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Minnick
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Schilling et al
as 7:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Tony Adams, James Bentley, Amy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Ray
as 7:2011cv00160
Petitioner:
Tony Foster
Respondent:
Tracy S. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parker v. Amos et al
as 7:2011cv00129
Defendant:
Christina Amos, Floyd G. Aylor, Frank Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephon Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2011cv00119
Defendant:
Capt. Patricia Cauldwell and Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Plaintiff:
Tony Harold Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Tate et al
as 7:2011cv00091
Defendant:
Sgt. Tony Adams, C/O Walter Daivs, Lt. Stacy Day and others
Plaintiff:
Donell J. Blount, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States Of America v. Brunson et al
as 7:2011mc00003
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Defendant:
Joseph B Brunson, Timothy McQueen and Tony Pough
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
