Cases 51 - 60 of 671
Moore v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Terell Moore
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambliss v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Raheem Chambliss
Respondent:
Lt. Bray, Sheriff Milum and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00417
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Jamal Kemo Saunders and Forever Al-Mani Hamilton
Respondent:
Director Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Harold W. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Nicholas Alan Jenkins
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Buchanan County Circuit Court and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Carl A. Manis, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
