Cases 51 - 60 of 663
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Carl A. Manis, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Holloway et al
as 7:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Isaw Waleed Blake
Defendant:
Mr. Holloway, Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Mss. E. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Thomas King
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, C/O Adikin, C/O Fusion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray-El v. O'Boyle et al
as 7:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Eric McCray-El
Defendant:
Patricia O'Boyle, K. Paderick, Jeffrey C. Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Unknown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Justin Leon Walker
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Reyes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Kyle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Warden et al
as 7:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden, Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
