Cases 1 - 10 of 584
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Scalf et al
as 7:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Matthias Mills
Defendant:
Officer S. Scalf, Officer Geldenhuys, Officer B. Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Ballad Health et al
as 7:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Ballad Health, M.D. Robert B. Jolley and R.N. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spencer v. Maan et al
as 7:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
David B. Spencer
Defendant:
Amondeep Singh Maan and Renson Transport, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
