Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
v. Pearson
as 7:2020cv00175
Respondent:
Eddie Pearson
Petitioner:
Manneh Vay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Pearson
as 7:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
Eddie L. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gleason v. Pearson
as 7:2012cv00619
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Gleason, Jr.
Respondent:
Eddie L. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Stephens v. Pearson
as 7:2012cv00356
Defendant:
Eddie Pearson
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00013
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Mercury Casualty Company v. Pearson et al
as 7:2012cv00027
Defendant:
David Boley, GEICO General Insurance Company, Jack Luikhart and others
Plaintiff:
Mercury Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
De'lonta v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00257
Defendant:
Gary L. Bass, Meredith R. Carey, Major C. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ophelia Azriel De'lonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, J. Jabe, A. Teklu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iman et al v. Hall et al
as 7:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Naiyer Iman, Lubna Imam, Khursheed Imam and others
Defendant:
James Hall, Susan Hall, StellarOne Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
