Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 823
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00308
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fenton v. USA
as 5:2024cv81552
Petitioner: Percival Norman Fenton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pennington v. USA
as 5:2024cv81551
Petitioner: Eric Keith Pennington
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cole et al v. Lucid USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Robert Morgan Cole and Staci Lynn Melissa Guillemin
Defendant: Lucid USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
De La Cruz-Leonardo v. USA
as 6:2024cv81550
Petitioner: Luis Ramon De La Cruz-Leonardo
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv81549
Petitioner: Larry Ray Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Skaggs v. USA
as 2:2024cv81548
Petitioner: David Kyle Skaggs
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv81547
Petitioner: Gary Christopher Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimmer v. USA
as 3:2024cv81546
Petitioner: Gary Lee Rimmer
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
City of Martinsville, Virginia v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: City of Martinsville, Virginia
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?