Cases 101 - 110 of 1,104
Chaney v. Webb et al
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Elijah-Dane: Chaney
Defendant:
Teresa J Webb and Superior Court of Spokane County Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mickelson v. Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ian Mickelson
Defendant:
Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ames v. Ames et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Stanley Roy Ames, Wesley Bruce Ames, Merita Lynn Dysart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Karla Marie Jones
Defendant:
John Earl Jones, Mr. Clay, Joseph Evan Lafrance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Margitan v. Spokane County
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Allan Margitan
Defendant:
Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Caughey et al v. Benton County
as 4:2022cv05062
Counter Defendant:
Steve Caughey, Todd Carlson, Mat Clarke and others
Counter Claimant:
Benton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Grenning v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Neil Grenning
Defendant:
James R Key and Ann Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orozco v. Yakima Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
John E Orozco
Defendant:
Yakima Sheriff's Office, Sergio Reyna, John Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
Israel Rodriguez, State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC v. City of Richland
as 4:2022cv05055
Plaintiff:
Saddle Mountain Minerals LLC
Defendant:
City of Richland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.