Cases 31 - 40 of 1,896
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 4712 Enhancement of contractor protection from reprisal for disclosure of certain information
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Brooks Jr v. Ballard et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daryl T Brooks Jr
Defendant:
Amy Ballard, Garlfield County Washington Sheriffs Department and Washington State DSHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Elmer-Smith vs. Spokane County Sheriff Office
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Edward-Elmer Smith
Defendant:
Spokane County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perez v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Luis Andre Perez
Defendant:
State of Washington, Spokane County, City of Airway Heights and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Liedkie
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lynn L Jackson
Defendant:
Curtis L Liedkie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Downing v. Ekstrom et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tanawah M Downing
Defendant:
Alexander Carl Ekstrom and Diana Nicole Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eier v. Aukerman et al
as 4:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Theresa Eier
Defendant:
Laura Aukerman and City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.