Cases 31 - 40 of 3,565
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randhawa v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Satnam S Randhawa
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Phillip, Mark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
