Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pewitt v. Peak Foreclosure Services of Washington Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
James B Pewitt and Elizabeth C Pewitt
Defendant:
Peak Foreclosure Services of Washington Inc , Peak Foreclosure Services Inc and Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glore v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03027
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Glore
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. Parks et al
as 4:2015cv05011
Plaintiff:
Alan White
Defendant:
Wayne Parks , It's Pawsible Dog Training Center and Day Camp and Elizabeth Parks-Ostowski
Counter_claimant:
Elizabeth Parks-Ostowski , Wayne Parks and It's Pawsible Dog Training Center and Day Camp
Counter_defendant:
Alan White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Brown et al v. Zirkle Fruit Company et al
as 1:2015cv03007
Plaintiff:
Bruce L Brown and Elizabeth J Brown
Defendant:
Zirkle Fruit Company and Rainier Fruit Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valentine v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Nicole Elizabeth Valentine
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Brison v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Brison
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stroy v. Thamert et al
as 4:2014cv05044
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Edwin Stroy
Defendant:
Carol Thamert, Elizabeth Suiter, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
