Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beggs v. Mason
as 1:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
Forrest Arthur Beggs
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olivet Nazarene University v. Upper Columbia Mission Society et al
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Olivet Nazarene University
Defendant:
Upper Columbia Mission Society, Upper Columbia Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists doing business as Upper Columbia Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists and Arthur Lenz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Shaw et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Arthur Shaw and Kimberly Shaw
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Eckhart v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Steven Eckhart
Defendant:
Asotin County, Asotin County Sheriffs Office, John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bandon Fitness (Texas), Inc. v. DDK Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Bandon Fitness (Texas), Inc. and Bandon Fitness (Texas) Inc
Defendant:
DDK Fitness LLC, Dylan Tipps, Kevin Tipps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Mendez v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Mendez, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moore v. Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
as 2:2021cv00217
Petitioner:
Don Arthur Moore
Respondent:
Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andy v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03203
Plaintiff:
Arthur Andy
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cardenas v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00278
Petitioner:
Arthur Frank Cardenas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
