Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mendiola v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv05084
Plaintiff:
Veronica Mendiola
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 4:2020cv05137
Plaintiff:
James Alan Butler and Vikki Lynne Butler
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv05136
Plaintiff:
Teresa Hernandez
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodcock v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 1:2020cv03100
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Woodcock
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00217
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haviland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv05066
Defendant:
Ethicon LLC, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Haviland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2020cv05045
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Louise Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raines et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2020cv05025
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Plaintiff:
Donna Raines and Ronald Raines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padgham v. Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. KG et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Padgham
Defendant:
Karl Storz GMBH & Co KG, Karl Storz Endoscopy America Inc, Karl Storz Endovision Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Ethicon Inc dba Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Martin
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc dba Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
