Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Benshoof v. Keenan et al
as 2:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Kurt Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof, I
Defendant:
David Keenan, Adrian Diaz and Jessica Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davey et al v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2023cv05399
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen Davey, Kristopher S Starkgraf, Carl Boyd Obenchin and others
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Pierce County Council, Edward C Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavalli v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05690
Plaintiff:
Roberto Cavalli and Cravan Adrian Sturges
Defendant:
State of Washington, Western State Hospital, David Gregerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phipps v. Kaiman et al
as 2:2018cv01684
Defendant:
Mark Kaiman, Adrian Madrone, Jeffrey Lustick and others
Plaintiff:
Lane S. Phipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pulkkinen et al
as 2:2018cv01239
Defendant:
Levi Pulkkinen, Cecelia Gregson, Diana Adrian Price and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Guy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Thrasher
as 3:2017cv06072
Plaintiff:
Adrian L Brown
Defendant:
Tim Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Contreras-Rebollar v. Key
as 3:2015cv05471
Petitioner:
Adrian Contreras-Rebollar
Respondent:
U.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maupin v. Glebe
as 3:2015cv05431
Petitioner:
Adrian Joseph Maupin
Respondent:
Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras-Rebollar v. Culpepper et al
as 3:2012cv05689
Plaintiff:
Adrian Contreras-Rebollar
Defendant:
Ronald Culpepper, J Penoyar, J Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
