Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Sanchez v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Brian Sanchez
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Oscar G. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sanchez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. King County
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Leland Dulani Harris
Defendant:
King County the City of Seattle, Philip Sanchez and King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmitt v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv01693
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schmitt and Jacob I Schmitt
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington Department of Corrections, Victoria Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01523
Plaintiff:
Roberto Mendez-Sanchez
Respondent:
Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv05840
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Hernandez-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv05643
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Hernandez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCamey v. Adult Behavior Health Services et al
as 2:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Adult Behavior Health Services, Zahn, Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy A McCamey and Timothy Addison McCamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Smith
as 2:2019cv00282
Plaintiff:
Sergio Gregorio Sanchez
Defendant:
Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
