Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Boyd v. County of Pierce et al
as 3:2020cv05207
Defendant:
Jessica A Williams, County of Pierce, Janel French and others
Plaintiff:
Broderick J Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Christopher Fyall, John Doe 2, Leo Jung and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Unknown Officials of Designation and Sentence Computation Center (Grand Prairie, Texas), Connie Tonini, Israel Jacquez and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Bruce John Denny, David Allen McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2019cv01584
Defendant:
Jewitt, Santos Deleon, Grady and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Bacon et al
as 2:2019cv01169
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Myers
Defendant:
Chelsea Troutman, Tamra Culver, Rozell Beleford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. City of King County et al
as 2:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rhodes
Defendant:
City of King County, Seattle Police Department and Christopher Jaron Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2016cv05458
Plaintiff:
Dennis McDaniel
Defendant:
Margaret Gilbert, Patrick Glebe, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2014cv01886
Plaintiff:
Edward L Fulton
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City Attorney's Office, Hightower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Burnett et al
as 3:2014cv05087
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Holcomb
Defendant:
Charles Burnett, Jennifer Minkler, Grays Harbor County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Tulalip Tribes Inc.
as 2:2011cv01348
Respondent:
Tulalip Tribes Inc.
Petitioner:
Fred Charles Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
