Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Morton et al v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Paul Morton and Rita Morton
Defendant:
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morton v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05468
Plaintiff:
Valerie Morton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barstad v. Department of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
James Barstad
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Washington, Bernard E Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortland v. City of Morton, et al
as 3:2011cv05550
Plaintiff:
Brian Cortland
Defendant:
City of Morton , Jim Gerwig , Sherry Claycamp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LeViege-Morton v. Crime Stoppers et al
as 2:2010cv01090
Plaintiff:
Taion A. LeViege-Morton
Defendant:
Crime Stoppers, Western Washington's Most Wanted, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00985
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muniz-Sanchez v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2009cv01659
Petitioner:
Evangelina Muniz-Sanchez
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, John Morton, James Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2009cv01658
Petitioner:
Jorge Cervantes Diaz
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, John Morton, James Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
