Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Flowers v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Flowers, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Seattle, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yi et al v. Chansun Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Mun Song Yi and Yong Suk Yi
Defendant:
Chansun Inc, Chan Ho Pak and Malseon Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bagley et al v. AAI Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05564
Plaintiff:
Todd Bagley , Jane Doe Bagley and Andrew Chan
Defendant:
AAI Corporation and AAI Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00847
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fulton v. Fulton et al
as 2:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
Edward L Fulton
Defendant:
Bruce Fulton and Ju-Chan Fulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chan v. Chase Home Loans Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kwai Ling Chan
Defendant:
Chase Home Loans Inc and Reconstrust Company N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chan v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2011cv01766
Plaintiff:
Hark C. Chan
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chan v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. et al
as 2:2011cv01693
Plaintiff:
Hark C. Chan
Defendant:
Sprint Spectrum LP and Nextel Operations Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Chan v. Chase Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 2:2011cv01599
Plaintiff:
Kwai Ling Chan
Defendant:
Chase Home Loans Servicing LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
United States of America v. Real property located at 2601 College Ave. #202, Berkeley, California, et al
as 3:2011cv05518
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 2601 College Ave., #202, Berkeley, California and One (1) 2007 Toyota Rav 4 Ltd
Claimant:
Christina C Chan , Joshua P Chan and Ruth L Ruckman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
