Cases 1 - 10 of 84
D'allo v. Modrijan et al
as 3:2024cv05325
Plaintiff:
Timjae A D'allo
Defendant:
Stephanie Modrijan, Vanessa MacBride, Courtney Durrah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Tanner Owens
Defendant:
King County, Patti Cole-Tindall and Jesse Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Burien v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Counter Defendant:
City of Burien
Defendant:
King County and Patricia Cole-Tindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cole-Tindall et al v. City of Burien
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Sheriff Patricia Cole-Tindall, King County and Patricia Cole-Tindall
Defendant:
City of Burien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cole et al v. City of Longview et al
as 3:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
Julie Cole and Mary Jones
Defendant:
City of Longview, Robert Huhta, Matt Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gates v. Cole-Tindall
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Brandon T Gates
Respondent:
Patti Cole-Tindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 3:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Cole
as 3:2023cv05935
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
David Cole
Defendant:
David Brian Cole
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
