Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Shimkus v. Stanley
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Stan Shimkus
Defendant:
Brad Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Salaverria v. Alaska Air Group et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group, Ben Minicucci, Brad Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ptah v. Berger et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Malek Kalid Ptah
Defendant:
Franke Berger, Brad Bales and Mark B Tackitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Demos v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05604
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Jay R Inslee, Cheryl Strange, Robert Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benshoof v. Fauci et al
as 2:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof
Defendant:
Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Stephen Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bodo v. Angasan et al
as 2:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Gracie Bodo
Defendant:
Brad Angasan, Renalda Angasan, F/V Novarupta and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Slater v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ethan A Slater
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson and Travis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toppen et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2022cv05312
Plaintiff:
Jamie Toppen and Brad Toppen
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Crawford v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05308
Plaintiff:
Paul Donovan Crawford
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johansson and Travis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
