Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Webb v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kitsap County, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Washington v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Webb et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05448
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Robert Watson Ferguson, Kitsap County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Kitsap County Government, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of DuPont v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv05702
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wills et al v. City of Dupont Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv05795
Plaintiff:
Michele Erickson and Russell R Wills
Defendant:
City of Dupont Police Department and City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2014cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Allen , Lawrence J Allen , Vivian Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , Boeing Commercial Airplanes , Landau Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Casimir v. Remington Arms Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Darlene Casimir
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc. and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
