Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Kristal J Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Griepsma v. Anderson
as 2:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
James David Griepsma
Defendant:
Christian J Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05575
Plaintiff:
Valerie J. Anderson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Snyder et al
as 3:2014cv05479
Plaintiff:
Earl J Anderson
Defendant:
Klaus O Snyder and Allen Ducatt
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Mahoney et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Mahoney, Sjon C Stevens, Cliff Borjeson and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, City of Seattle , Ed Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05772
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Anderson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. City of Bainbridge Island et al
as 3:2009cv05797
Plaintiff:
Max J Anderson
Defendant:
City of Bainbridge Island, Richard Christopherson and Guy Roche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. drugstore.com inc et al
as 2:2004cv01474
Plaintiff:
Frederic J Elliott and Kathleen Keul
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Duft Group, Randall Simon, Jane Zebari and others
Defendant:
drugstore.com inc, Kal Raman, Robert Barton and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Peter M Neupert
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
