Cases 1 - 10 of 38
White Hair Solutions LLC v. Gideon Capital Investments & Management LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
White Hair Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Gideon Capital Investments & Management LLC, Diego Aizcorbe, Chuck Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2023cv00550
Defendant:
Landes and Compagnie Trust Prive, Charles T Lawrence, Jr, Landes Prive LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
Maria Elvia Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Summit Contracting Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01743
Defendant:
Chad M Schampers, Nathaniel R Smith and Summit Contracting Inc
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Rajendra et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
Mark D Smith, Gloster B Current, Kevin Wheeler and others
Nominal Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv01198
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
Ajita Rajendra, John Kita, AO Smith Corporation and others
Lewis v. Smith
as 2:2019cv00964
Petitioner:
Jerome Lewis
Respondent:
Tisha Ann-Marie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
