Cases 81 - 90 of 707
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Ball v. United States Department of Education et al
as 2:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ball
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Nelnet Inc, Transunion Intermediate Holding Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Demetrius L. Stephenson v. Calumet County et al
as 1:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Estate of Demetrius L. Stephenson and Estate of Demetrius L Stephenson
Defendant:
Calumet County, Maggie Ratajczak, Dalia Dedering and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
