Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Day et al
as 2:2019cv01873
Defendant:
Audrey Bucher, Kenny Day and Teresa Wiegand
Plaintiff:
Darnell F Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Marwitz et al
as 2:2019cv01379
Defendant:
Lt Rogers, J Spors, J Ludwig and others
Plaintiff:
Daquon Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Greer et al
as 2:2019cv01061
Defendant:
DAI Administrator, Jess O'Donnell, Capt. Baumann and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Robert Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Day v. Wisconsin Dept of Corrections
as 2:2016cv01251
Plaintiff:
Adam O'Day
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tatum
Defendant:
Edward Wall , Gary Boughton, Mark Kartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Pollard
as 2:2013cv00106
Defendant:
William Pollard
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Hughes et al
as 2:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Hughes, Michael Bertling and McLario Helm & Bertling SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hughes et al
as 2:2010cv00989
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Hughes, Michael Bertling and McLario Helm Bertling SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. International Association of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers et al
as 2:2010cv00560
Defendant:
International Association of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, International Association of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcement Iron Workers Midwestern District Counsel, Iron Workers Local 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
