Cases 51 - 60 of 331
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Audra Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Yoder v. Jones Sign Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Jared Yoder
Defendant:
Jones Sign Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Hoftiezer et al
as 2:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Leroy S Jones
Defendant:
Scott Hoftiezer, Julie Ludwig, Stephen Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Juno
as 1:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Mike Donovan, William Pollard and Sandra L Juno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henigan v. Lucas et al
as 2:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Elijah Terrell Henigan
Defendant:
Earnell R Lucas, Aaron Dobson, CO Pit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
as 2:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo C Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jones
Defendant:
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simms et al v. Dobson et al
as 2:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Simms, Tommy T Bush, Morningstar Thomas and others
Defendant:
Inspector Dobson, Earnell Lucas, David Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne et al v. TRITI et al
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne, Robert D Cartledge, Justin L Williams and others
Defendant:
TRITI, MPJMJ, CNMCM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dillenberg et al
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Melvin Jones
Defendant:
Sgt Dillenberg, CO M Bridges, Capt James Elsinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
