Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Locke v. Pollard
as 2:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Brian Russell Locke
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Chiarkas et al
as 2:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
Nicholas L Chiarkas, Kellie Krake, Deborah Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell et al v. Schwarz Pharma Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
James Russell and Judith Russell
Involuntary Plaintiff:
Mike Leavitt and Aetna Health Insurance Company
Defendant:
Schwarz Pharma Inc, Schwarz Pharma Inc, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Long v. Monroe et al
as 2:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
Beverly Long
Defendant:
Kenneth Monroe, Town of Bloomfield, Nancy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Cox v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2009cv01077
Petitioner:
William Russell Cox
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scripture et al v. Linn et al
as 2:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
Connie Scripture, Connie Scripture, Russell Scripture and others
Defendant:
Dennis E Linn, Dennis E Linn, Robert J Dzbinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
Russell Wright
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bluemel v. Thurmer et al
as 1:2009cv01014
Plaintiff:
Paul Bluemel
Defendant:
Michael Thurmer, Nurse Mary, Dr Sumnicht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Lutsey et al
as 2:2009cv00850
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell Locke
Defendant:
RN Lutsey, HSU Supervisor Zwier and Dr Heidorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
