Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rogers v. Hernandez
as 2:2023cv00571
Defendant:
Peter Gene Hernandez and Bruno Mars
Plaintiff:
Angelina M Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
The Scan Group Inc v. Jensen et al
as 2:2020cv01187
Plaintiff:
The Scan Group, Inc. and The Scan Group Inc
Defendant:
Jacob Jensen, Melissa Jensen, CLIF Bar & Co. and others
Ramirez v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv01174
Plaintiff:
Jose D Ramirez
Defendant:
Robert Brown, Constance Brown and Aud Mar Banquets Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Smidt et al v. Oconto County et al
as 1:2011cv00786
Plaintiff:
Colleen De Smidt , Charles De Smidt and De Smidts Golf Course & Country Club Inc
Defendant:
Oconto County , Marinette County and Mar-Oco Landfill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suzhou Parsun Power Machine Co Ltd et al v. Western Import Manufacturing Distribution Group LTD et al
as 2:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
Suzhou Parsun Power Machine Co Ltd and Mars Electric LLC
Defendant:
Western Import Manufacturing Distribution Group LTD, Shelley Anne Hudson and John Hudson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Damaske et al v. The Hershey Company et al
as 2:2008cv00131
Plaintiff:
Debra L Damaske, Debra L Damaske, Debra L Damaske and others
Defendant:
The Hershey Company, The Hershey Company, Mars Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund et al v. Pro-Mar Construction Inc
as 2:2007cv00944
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund, Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund, Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers and others
Defendant:
Pro-Mar Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
De Mars v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00727
Plaintiff:
Theresa A De Mars
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
