Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dotel, Jose et al v. Dittaman, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Jose Dotel, Luis Davila-Diaz and Miguel A. Dotel Sierra
Defendant:
Michael Dittaman , Scott Anderson, Alfonso Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagar, Humberto v. Raemisch, Richard et al
as 3:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
Humberto Lagar
Defendant:
Richard F. Raemisch , Gary H. Hamblin , Alfonso J. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson, Donald v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Karen E. Timberlake , Thomas H. Bowd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders, Christopher v. LaCost et al
as 3:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Sanders
Defendant:
LaCost , Nicholai , Jeff Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagar, Humberto v. Raemisch, Rick et al
as 3:2010cv00836
Plaintiff:
Humberto Lagar
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , Alfonso Graham , Danielle LaCost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley v. Huibregtse et al
as 3:2009cv00700
Petitioner:
Battites Wesley
Respondent:
Peter Huibregtse, Rick Raemisch and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Raemisch et al
as 3:2009cv00238
Petitioner:
Willie Roy Love
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Raemish et al
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Leonard Collins
Defendant:
Richard Raemish, Mark Heise, Jayne Hackbark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders v. Graham et al
as 3:2008cv00716
Plaintiff:
Ben Sanders, Jr.
Defendant:
Alfonso Graham and Jayne Hackbarth
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STANTON, Thomas v. Graham, Alfonso et al.
as 3:2008cv00492
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. STANTON
Defendant:
Alfonso Graham, WILLIAM RANKIN, QUALA CHAMPANGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
