Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wittkamper v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Wittkamper
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Thomas H. Hansen, Deputy K. J. Stipanovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Wolfe et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
R.M. Wolfe, H. Berryman and K. Siler-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
King v. Utt et al
as 5:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Andrew King
Defendant:
Jason K. Utt, Friend Estep and City of New Martinsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Harris et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris and Joint Chiefs of Staff
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Sell et al
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Marlene K. Reed
Defendant:
Rickey Sell, Sr., Masterful Designs, LLC, Town of Barrackville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houdersheldt v. Anderson et al
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Houdersheldt
Defendant:
R. K. Anderson and Mineral County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Edwards et al
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
TFC, F.H Edwards, Andrew S. Arnold, Esq., Gregory K. Jones, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulse v. Layne et al
as 3:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Donna K. Pulse
Defendant:
Perry Shannon Layne, Kenneth Lemasters and Berkeley County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton v. Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches et al v. Degeorge et al
as 5:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Michael David Booth and 2600.com
Defendant:
Rex K. Degeorge and Stephen Robert Gunning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
