Cases 151 - 160 of 5,969
Moore v. Ray (Warden)
as 5:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Heather Ray (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hakeem v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Okerayi K. Hakeem
Respondent:
H. Ray, Z. Moore and P. Betschart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. USA
as 3:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Alieu T. Crayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Abraham v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Daniel Abraham
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leon v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Nestor Leon
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stokes v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Terence Renato Stokes, Jr.
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Lab Corp, Laboratory Corporation of America, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Respondent:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bandy v. Mon County EMS et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Bandy
Defendant:
Mon County EMS, WVa Medi Inc, Christopher Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKelvey v. Coss et al
as 5:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jamel McKelvey
Defendant:
Cpt. Coss, Lt. Krueghen, Officer Ickler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
