Cases 171 - 180 of 5,951
Williams v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Iry James Williams
Respondent:
Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Inman v. Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Petitioner:
James Robert Inman
Respondent:
Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) and Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guerrero v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Domingo Guerrero
Respondent:
Warden H. L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blackwell v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Norman Blackwell
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fleischer v. Hoskins et al
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hoskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Canestraro et al
as 3:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega
Defendant:
Joseph Canestraro, Bryan Gaus, Eric Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Dricko Dashon Huskey
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
