Cases 41 - 50 of 5,952
Green v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Damion Dante Maurice Green
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Brandi Otey, Raliegh County Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stout v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Stout
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smallwood v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carl Smallwood
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Timothy Tibbs and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
