Cases 51 - 60 of 5,952
McClure v. Tygart County Regional Jail
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christie Coy McClure, Jr.
Defendant:
Tygart County Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Javon Dawson
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Love
Respondent:
A.U.S.A. Brandon S. Flowers and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of West Virginia at Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Eric Barker
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Anthony Mori
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Damion Dante Maurice Green
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Brandi Otey, Raliegh County Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Park v. USA
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Christopher Louis Park
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
