Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,971
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maloney v. Lovett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Robert Maloney
Respondent: Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maddox, Jr. v. USA
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner: William Edward Maddox, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
As-Salafi v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Abdul-Malik As-Salafi
Respondent: Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sosa v. Browning et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Oscar Sosa
Defendant: Ms. Browning, Ms. Stout and Unknown Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner: Brooks Terrell
Respondent: Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant: Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Kamron Eugene Miller, Sr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Booker v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner: Donte Booker
Respondent: Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?