Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Macedo-Flores v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Austreberta Macedo-Flores
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pilgrim v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Pilgrim
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burdette v. Aldi Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ashley N. Burdette
Defendant:
Aldi Inc. and Peter McGinley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alfano et al v. Snowshoe Mountain, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Alfano, III and Crista S. Alfano
Defendant:
Snowshoe Mountain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Liounis v. Wolfe
as 3:2022cv00137
Petitioner:
Peter Liounis
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Liounis v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Peter George Liounis
Respondent:
Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Liounis v. Hudgins
as 3:2020cv00092
Petitioner:
Peter Liounis
Respondent:
Robert Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
