Cases 41 - 50 of 310
Arbogast v. Maston et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Unit Manager Jack Stollings, Don Spingston, Steven Kalinofski and others
Plaintiff:
John F. Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shears et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gary F. Shears, Jr. and Judith A. Shears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moore v. Bowers
as 3:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Warden F. J. Bowers
Plaintiff:
John Kevin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hendrix et al
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
T. R. Titchenell, D. Jones, Dewayne Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Earl Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Bowers
as 1:2020cv00184
Respondent:
Warden F. J. Bowers
Petitioner:
Ratique Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller et al v. Alecto Healthcare Services Fairmont, LLC
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Alecto Healthcare Services Fairmont, LLC, Fairmont General Hospital and Alecto Healthcare Services Fairmont, LLC doing business as Fairmont Regional Medical Center also known as Fairmont General Hospital
Plaintiff:
Marsue Lancaster, John Whitaker, David Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Riley et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc,
as 3:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Darlene L. Riley and Lewis F. Riley
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Smith v. The City of Pennsboro et al
as 1:2020cv00054
Defendant:
F. T. Davis, The City of Pennsboro and R.T. Davis
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens et al v. The City Of Pennsboro et al
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant:
F. T. Davis, The City Of Pennsboro and R. T. Davis
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Owens and Anita M. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
