Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Garcia v. FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Adam Leal Garcia
Defendant:
FBI and CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Segundo Tarquino Guero Garcia and Segundo Tarquino Cuero Garcia
Respondent:
H. L. Ray and Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia-Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Juan Garcia-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Roane
as 5:2022cv00287
Petitioner:
Leonel A. Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Warden Roane
as 3:2022cv00196
Petitioner:
Leonel A. Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wojdag v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Wojdag
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Nelson B. Garcia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinones-Cedeno v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2020cv00198
Defendant:
E. Garcia, Paul Adams, Ms. M. Thompkis and others
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quinones-Cedeno v. Ridenour et al
as 3:2020cv00088
Defendant:
A. Garcia, Paul Adams, Ms. M. Thompkis and others
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedero and Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Antonelli et al
as 3:2019cv00115
Respondent:
B.M. Antonelli, F. Entzel and E. Garcia
Petitioner:
Richard A. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
