Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Davis v. Lovett et al
as 5:2024cv00140
Defendant: John Doe, Shiek and S. Lovett
Plaintiff: Nathen Earl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Riley v. Lovett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner: Damien Woodrow Riley
Respondent: Steve Lovett and Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCollum v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner: Kevin McCollum
Respondent: Warden S. Lovett and H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Respondent: Warden Lovette
Petitioner: Dallas Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant: Mr. S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: William C. Brown
Defendant: Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Dallas Ford
Respondent: Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maloney v. Lovett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Robert Maloney
Respondent: Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner: Brooks Terrell
Respondent: Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?