Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Underwood et al
as 5:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granville Thompson
Defendant:
Jennifer Underwood, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Warden, FCI Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Underwood et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granvill Thompson
Defendant:
Jennifer Underwood, Dr. Emmanuel Adams and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Underwood, Jr. v. Galotti et al
as 5:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Andrew Galotti, J Carey, Owen Burdette and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wade Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Galotti
as 5:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rodney Underwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Galotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Adams, Warden et al
as 5:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Nurse L. Bird, Director Michael Carvajal, P. Adams, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Tonia L. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Underwood v. Gomez
as 1:2019cv00127
Respondent:
C. Gomez
Petitioner:
Jimmy Levon Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Underwood v. Gomez
as 1:2019cv00033
Petitioner:
Zachary Charles Underwood
Respondent:
Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
