General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,766
Dickens v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00473
Petitioner: Gary Dickens
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner: Elvis Anderson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00553
Petitioner: Jason Walker
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Quijue Delgado v. Heckard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00443
Petitioner: Sandro Fabricio Quijue Delgado
Respondent: K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ervin v. Holzapel
as 5:2023cv00457
Petitioner: WAYNE ERVIN
Respondent: K. Heckard and W. Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Summers v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00452
Petitioner: Eric Germaine Summers
Respondent: Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bennett v. Warden FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00477
Petitioner: Marcus Bennett
Respondent: FCI Beckley and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00490
Petitioner: Dewayne Anderson
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lozada v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00460
Petitioner: Anthony Lozada
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cabrera v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00459
Petitioner: Lucilo Cabrera
Defendant: K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?