Cases 1 - 10 of 1,519
Goods v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Daryl Cox, Chase Cox, AUSA Andrew Spievack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adams v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Keith Deshon Adams
Defendant:
Oak Hill Police Offi Brandon Dodrill and Oak Hill Police Offi Tyler Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanham v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Levi Lanham
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation, Anthony Booher, Correctional Officer Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Daff et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Marcum
Defendant:
Shane Daff and Montana Covert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Hively
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Herbert L. Hively, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Wilshire
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Maurice-Edward: Thompson
Defendant:
S. Wilshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalle v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Sean Nalle
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Correctional Officer Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
