Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Rogers v. Tarbox et al
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rogers
Defendant:
Craig A. Tarbox, Riverside Transportation, Inc., Riverside Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nelson et al v. I & I Sling, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
Beverly Dawn Nelson, J. N., C. N. and others
Defendant:
I & I Sling, Inc. and Craig D. Brewer
Not Classified By Court:
Damon Faldowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frye et al v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
Mary Frye and Craig Frye
Defendant:
VEP Healthcare, Inc. and Stacy Amanda Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03744
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Monica Lane Craig
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baxter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Kathy Baxter and Wade Craig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12578
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Craig
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jensen et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09288
Plaintiff:
Laura Jensen and Craig Jensen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sevy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv08803
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Sevy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06662
Plaintiff:
Maggie Craig and Donald W. Craig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
