Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Fletcher v. Bar 101, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv13784
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Fletcher
Defendant:
Bar 101, LLC and S. Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lowe et al v. Peabody Holding Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv06925
Plaintiff:
Hubert Lowe, Manuel Ojeda, Carl Egnor and others
Defendant:
Peabody Holding Company, LLC, Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Miller v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv03461
Plaintiff:
Christin Miller
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and Norma Jean Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. v Bias
as 2:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Emory Bias
Third_party_plaintiff:
Charles Emory Bias
Third_party_defendant:
Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc. , Administrative Resource Management, LLC , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. v. Bias
as 2:2011cv00480
Plaintiff:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Emory Bias
Third_party_plaintiff:
Charles Emory Bias
Third_party_defendant:
Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc. , Administrative Resource Management, LLC , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Miller v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Amanda Miller
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan, National Carriers' Conference Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
