Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Thompson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05655
Plaintiff:
Sandra Thompson and Duane Thompson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03992
Plaintiff:
Dolores Adams and Duane Adams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eaves v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv03547
Petitioner:
Duane Eaves
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Berry et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01618
Plaintiff:
Gail Berry and Duane Berry
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaught et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15906
Plaintiff:
Melissa Vaught and Duane Vaught
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saylor et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15725
Plaintiff:
Betty Saylor and Duane Saylor
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14829
Plaintiff:
April R. Roberts and Duane V. Roberts
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mundhenke et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09667
Plaintiff:
Connie Mundhenke and Duane Mundhenke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08746
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bell and Darrell Duane Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Burke et al
as 3:2014cv26429
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Johnson, Duane Maynard, Norman Dillon and others
Defendant:
Austin Burke, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
