Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Bone et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12158
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Bone and Jeffery C. Bone
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12030
Plaintiff:
Dawn Weathers Hollis and Jeffery Hollis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv11846
Plaintiff:
Tonya S. Fields and Jeffery J. Fields
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. W.V. Mildred Mitchell Bateman Hospital et al
as 3:2015cv10569
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Cook
Defendant:
W.V. Mildred Mitchell Bateman Hospital, Georgette Bradstreet, S.C. Offices at CRCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levesque et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05404
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Levesque and Jeffery Levesque
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auth et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04287
Plaintiff:
Mary Kay Auth and Jeffery C. Auth, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cool et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv03454
Plaintiff:
Linda Cool and Jeffery Cool
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yandell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02874
Plaintiff:
Ladonna M. Yandell and Jeffery Yandell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31378
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Howell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
