Cases 41 - 50 of 233
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12616
Plaintiff:
Erin C. Jones and Willie B. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10636
Plaintiff:
Willie Lopez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09902
Plaintiff:
Marsha Willis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKibben et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09638
Plaintiff:
Patricia Darlene McKibben and John Willis McKibben, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Burke et al
as 3:2014cv26429
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Johnson, Duane Maynard, Norman Dillon and others
Defendant:
Austin Burke, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humann et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08379
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ann Humann and Willis Paul Humann
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. et al
as 2:2015cv08059
Plaintiff:
Roberta Lee Smith and Willie Joe Smith
Defendant:
Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07376
Plaintiff:
Wendy Wilson and Willie Jo Wilson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv06197
Plaintiff:
Willie Carolyn Miller
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06039
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Morris
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
