Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Mayo et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00536
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mayo , Patricia Kirby , Georgia Bowles and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Covidien Inc. , Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00845
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Dennis C. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LaRue v. Bowls et al
as 2:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
William A. LaRue
Defendant:
Cynthia Bowls and Wanda Hyden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bowling v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
James Walter Bowling, Sr., James Walter Bowling, Sr., James Walter Bowling, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cecil et al v. Mountaineer Bowling Lanes, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00282
Plaintiff:
Connie T. Cecil and Morstine Cecil
Defendant:
Mountaineer Bowling Lanes, Inc. and Mountaineer Bowling Lanes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. Royal Trucking Company et al
as 3:2008cv00280
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Johnson and Christopher L. Johnson
Defendant:
Royal Trucking Company and David L. Bowles
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bowles v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
as 5:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
Danny W. Bowles, Danny W. Bowles, Sandra K. Bowles and others
Defendant:
Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC, Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC and Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kostenko v. Ranavaya
as 5:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Merritt Kostenko
Defendant:
Mohammad Ranavaya, James B. Becker, Christopher J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
