Cases 61 - 70 of 504
Cummings v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Matthew Cummings
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robbs v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Jermaul Quinchon Robbs
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Jason Walker
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stargell v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Darion Stargell
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hagler v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00536
Petitioner:
Andrew Stuart Hagler
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reynolds v. Warden, FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Donald Reynolds
Respondent:
DSCC, FCI Beckley, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Osborne v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Gray Osborne
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chacon Saldana v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00526
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Chacon Saldana
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
